The numbers of both engines are very close; it is splitting hairs. The 2.0T feels spunkier off the line; the 3.6 feels smooth, linear and refined. If you live at elevation the 2.0T may be the better choice; if you plan to keep the Jeep for a long time the V6 may prove the better choice.
The acceleration is positively brisk compared to my previous 4x4 which was a Defender 2.2 litre Puma diesel. The Jeep has noticeably more torque and acceleration and the auto box and smooth drivetrain are a joy compared to the Defender's manual and clunky transmission. I went for the 2.2 diesel over the 2 litre petrol for a couple of reasons.
Official fuel-consumption figures for the diesel-powered Jeep Wrangler Rubicon are pegged at 7.5 litres per 100km, while we managed 9.9L/100km during our week with the car. We drove the Wrangler exclusively in inner-city environments though, with the urban fuel consumption rated at a closer-to-our-figure 9.3L/100km.
The SJ40 Jimny 1000 was introduced for 1982 to replace the LJ80 range. The Jimny 1000, sold as the Suzuki SJ410 in most export markets, used the F10A - a larger 1-litre version of the LJ's 0.8-litre four-cylinder engine. This engine produced 45 PS (33 kW; 44 hp) and it had a top speed of 68 mph (109 km/h).
OYaxo. q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/398q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/204q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/395q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/368q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/384q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/131q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/28q51s5pr8bf.pages.dev/397
jeep wrangler 2.2 diesel review
